Media organizations push back against US proposal to shorten foreign journalist stays

Leading international news organizations are calling on the United States to  withdraw  a proposal that would sharply restrict the time foreign correspondents can spend in the country.

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has put forward a rule that would limit stays on I visas—the category used by international journalists—to 240 days. Currently, such visas are typically valid for up to five years, offering reporters the time and stability needed to build trusted sources, understand local communities, and provide in-depth coverage of US politics, culture, and society.

 

A coalition of 119 media and journalist organizations from around the world has issued a joint statement indicating the administration to abandon the proposal. Coordinated by the European Broadcasting Union (EBU) and supported by the World Association of News Publishers (WAN-IFRA), the statement warns that the rule would “disrupt a proven system” and weaken global understanding of American life.

 

“By spending years, not months, on the ground, journalists gain the deep knowledge, trusted networks and contextual immersion needed to explain America to global audiences,” the statement reads. “The proposal to limit visas to 240 days would create instability for correspondents and their families, and reduce the quantity and quality of coverage coming from the US.”

The organizations argue that the change would not enhance national security—one of DHS's stated priorities—but would instead risk leaving international audiences less informed. In their absence, rival nations could shape narratives about the US in ways that serve their own interests.

 

Critics also stress the practical difficulties journalists would face on short-term visas, from renting housing and opening bank accounts to maintaining continuity in reporting.

 

“Instead of offering deep, sustained reporting on American politics, culture, and society, their work would risk being rushed, fragmented, and shallow,” the statement warns.

 

This is not the first time such a measure has been proposed. In 2021, a similar plan was withdrawn after an international outcry. Media organizations say the same outcome should follow now.

 

“The US has always stood for openness, freedom of expression and a strong, independent press,” the statement concludes. "Restricting foreign media access risks undermining that legacy. We urge the Administration to maintain the existing I visa framework, which supports the United States in projecting strength, credibility, and leadership worldwide."

 

Follow Daryo's official   Instagram ,  LinkedIn , and   Twitter   pages to keep current on world news